Skip to main content

Workflow

Description

Real-world public health data often provide numerous challenges. There may be a limited amount of background data, data dropouts, noise, and human error. The data from an emergency department (ED) in Urbana, IL includes a diagnosis field with multiple terms and notes separated by semicolons. There are over 7000 distinct terms, excluding the notes. Because it begins in April 2009, there is not yet adequate background data to use some of the regressionbased alerting algorithms. Values for some days are missing, so we also needed an algorithm that would tolerate data dropouts. 

INDICATOR is a workflow-based biosurveillance system developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications. One of the fundamental concepts of INDICATOR is that the burden of cleaning and processing incoming data should be on the software, rather than on the health care providers.

 

Objective

This paper compares different approaches with classification and anomaly detection of data from an ED.

Submitted by hparton on
Description

When a reportable condition is identified, clinicians and laboratories are required to report the case to public health authorities. These case reports help public health officials to make informed decisions and implement appropriate control measures to prevent the spread of disease. Incomplete or delayed case reports can result in new occurrences of disease that could have been prevented. To improve the disease reporting and surveillance processes, the Utah Department of Health is collaborating with Intermountain Healthcare and the University of Utah to electronically transmit case reports from healthcare facilities to public health entities using Health Level Seven v2.5, SNOMED CT, and LOINC. As part of the Utah Center of Excellence in Public Health Informatics, we conducted an observation study in 2009 to identify metrics to evaluate the impact of electronic systems. We collected baseline data in 2009 and in this paper we describe preliminary results from a follow-up study conducted in 2010.

 

Objective

This paper describes a comparison study conducted to identify quality of reportable disease case reports received at Salt Lake Valley health department in 2009 and 2010.

Submitted by hparton on
Description

The importance transmitting clinical information to public health for disease surveillance is well-documented. Conventional reporting processes require health care providers to complete paper-based notifiable condition reports which are transmitted by fax and mail to public health agencies. These processes result in incomplete reports, inconsistencies in reporting frequencies among different diseases and reporting delays as well as time-consuming follow-up by public health to get needed information. One strategy to address these issues is to electronically pre-populate report forms with available clinical, lab and patient data to streamline reporting workflows, increase data completeness and, ultimately, provide access to more timely and accurate surveillance data for public health organizations. Prior to implementing an intervention that includes using pre-populated forms, we conducted interviews in clinical and public health settings to identify the barriers and facilitators to adopting and utilizing the forms and their potential impact on workflow and perceived burden. These interviews are a component of a larger mixed methods evaluation that will triangulate pre- and post-intervention quantitative data quality measures with qualitative results.

Objective

Introduction of new health information technologies can produce unanticipated consequences on existing user behaviors, workflow, etc. Prior to implementing a public health reporting intervention, we conducted a series of interviews regarding workflow and perceptions of task burden with respect to notifiable condition reporting.

Submitted by knowledge_repo… on
Description

Abbreviation, misspellings, and site specific terminology may misclassify chief complaints syndromes. The Emergency Medical Text Processor (EMT-P) is system that cleans emergency department chief complaints and returns standard terms. However, little information is available on the implementation of EMT-P in a syndromic surveillance system.

 

Objective

To describe the implementation and baseline evaluation of EMT-P developed by the University of North Carolina.

Submitted by elamb on
Description

In 2004, the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) partnered with the Regenstrief Institute to begin collecting syndromic data from 14 ED’s to monitor bioterrorism-related events and other public health emergencies. Today, Indiana’s public health emergency surveillance system (PHESS) receives approximately 5,000 daily ED visits as real-time HL7 formatted surveillance data from 55 hospitals. The ISDH analyzes these data using ESSENCE and initiates field investigations when human review deems necessary.1 The Marion County Health Department, located in the state’s capitol and most populous county, is the first local health department in Indiana using ESSENCE.

 

Objective

This paper describes how local and state stakeholders interact with Indiana’s operational PHESS, including resources allocated to syndromic surveillance activities and methods for managing surveillance data flow. We also describe early successes of the system.

Submitted by elamb on
Description

Infectious disease outbreaks require rapid access to information to support a coordinated response from healthcare providers and public health officials. They need to know the size, spread, and location of the outbreak, and they also need access to models that will help them to determine the best strategy to contain the outbreak. 

There are numerous software tools for outbreak detection, and there are also surveillance systems that depend on communication between health care professionals. Most of those systems use a single type of surveillance data (e.g., syndromic, mandatory reporting, or laboratory) and focus on human surveillance.

However, there are fewer options for planning responses to outbreaks. Modeling and simulation are complex and resource-intensive. For example, EpiSims and EpiCast, developed by the National Institute of Health Models of Infectious Disease Agent Study involve large, diverse datasets and require access to high-performance computing.

Cyberenvironments are an integrated set of tools and services tailored to a specific discipline that allows the community to leverage the national cyberinfrastructure in their research and teaching. They provide data stores, computational capabilities, analysis and visualization services, and interfaces to shared instruments and sensor networks.

The National Center for Supercomputing Applications is applying the concept of cyberenvironments to infectious disease surveillance to produce INDICATOR.

 

Objective

This paper describes INDICATOR, a biosurveillance cyberenvironment used to analyze hospital data and generate alerts for unusual values.

Submitted by elamb on
Description

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency Chemical and Biological Technologies Directorate (DTRA CB) has initiated the Biosurveillance Ecosystem (BSVE) research and development program. Work process flow diagrams, with associated explanations and historical examples, were developed based on in-person, structured interviews with public health and preventative medicine analysts from a variety of Department of Defense (DoD) organizations, and with one organization in the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and with a major U.S. city health department. The particular nuanced job characteristics of each organization were documented and subsequently validated with the individual analysts. Additionally, the commonalities across different organizations were described in meta-workflow diagrams and descriptions.

Objective

Operational biosurveillance capability gaps were analyzed and the required characteristics of new technology were outlined, the results of which will be described in this contribution.

Submitted by uysz on