Skip to main content

Power Analysis

Description

Heuristics to detect irregularly shaped spatial clusters were reviewed recently. The spatial scan statistic is a widely used measure of the strength of clusters. However, other measures may also be useful, such as the geometric compactness penalty, the non-connectivity penalty and other measures based on graph topology and weak links.5,6 Those penalties p(z) are often coupled with the spatial scan statistic T(z), employing either the multiplicative formula maximization maxz T(z) ! p(z) or a multiobjective optimization procedure maxz(T(z), p(z)),3,6 or even a combination of both approaches. The geometric penalty of a cluster z is defined as the quotient of the area of z by the area of the circle, with the same perimeter as the convex hull of z, thus penalizing more the less rounded clusters. Now, let V and E be the vertices and edges sets, respectively, of the graph Gz(V, E) associated with the potential cluster z. The non-connectivity penalty y(z) is a function of the number of edges e(z) and the number of nodes n(z) of Gz(V, E), defined as y(z) ¼ e(z)/3[n(z)#2]. The less interconnected tree-shaped clusters are the most penalized. However, none of those two measures includes the effect of the individual populations.

Objective

Irregularly shaped clusters in maps divided into regions are very common in disease surveillance. However, they are difficult to delineate, and usually we notice a loss of power of detection. Several penalty measures for the excessive freedom of shape have been proposed to attack this problem, involving the geometry and graph topology of clusters. We present a novel topological measure that displays better performance in numerical tests.

Submitted by uysz on
Description

Prior work demonstrates the extent to which sampling strategies reduce the power to detect clusters.1 Additionally, the power to detect clusters can vary across space.2 A third, unexplored, effect is how much the sample size impacts the power of spatial cluster detection methods. This research examines this effect.

Objective

In syndromic surveillance settings, the use of samples may be unavoidable, as when only a part of the population reports flu-like symptoms to their physician. Taking samples from a complete population weakens the power of spatial cluster detection methods.1 This research examines the effectiveness of different sampling strategies and sample sizes on the power of cluster detection methods.

Submitted by Magou on
Description

Syndromic surveillance involves the analysis of time series of health indicators to identify changes in disease patterns. To this end, statistical modeling is used to reduce systematic data variation. Still, there is variation that cannot be accounted for in this approach, e.g. mass gatherings, extreme weather and other high-profile events. To filter sporadic events, data transformation can be applied, e.g. proportion data from correlated data streams (Peter, Najmi and Burkom, 2011; Reis, Kohane and Mandl, 2007). However, we lack systematic criteria for applying data transformations, e.g. ratios versus geometric means. To develop guidelines, we conducted a power analysis and compared the results with empirical findings (Andersson et al, 2013).

Objective

For the purpose of optimizing baselines for point-source outbreak detection, we carried out a power analysis of the effects of data transformations. More specifically, the aim was to develop statistical criteria for using composite baselines, i.e. ratios and geometric means of data streams. The results were validated by outbreak data on acute gastroenteritis (The Swedish National Telephone Health Service 1177).

Submitted by knowledge_repo… on