Policy

Public health surveillance systems are constantly facing challenges of epidemics and shortage in the health care workforce. These challenges are more pronounced in developing countries, which bear the greatest burden of disease and where new pathogens are more likely to emerge, old ones to reemerge and drug-resistant strains to propagate. In August 2008, a mobile phone based surveillance system was piloted in 6 of the 23 districts in the state of AP in India. Health workers in 3832 hospitals and health centers used mobile phones to send reports to and receive information from the nationwide Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP). Like in many other states, the IDSP in AP is facing many operational constraints like lack of human resource, irregular supply of logistics, hard to reach health facilities, poor coordination with various health programs and poor linkages with non-state stakeholders. The mobile phone based surveillance system was an attempt to tackle some of the barriers to improving the IDSP by capitalizing on the exponential growth in numbers as well as reach of mobile phones in the state. Promising results from the pilot of the system led AP state to extend it to about 16,000 reporting units in all 23 districts. This study evaluates how the system has affected the efficiency and effectiveness of IDSP in the state.

Objective

To assess the impact of use of mobile phones use on the efficiency and effectiveness of the Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) in the state of Andhra Pradesh (AP)

Every public health monitoring operation faces important decisions in its design phase. These include information sources to be used, the aggregation of data in space and time, the filtering of data records for required sensitivity, and the design of content delivery for users. Some of these decisions are dictated by available data limitations, others by objectives and resources of the organization doing the

surveillance. Most such decisions involve three characteristic tradeoffs: how much to monitor for exceptional vs customary health threats, the level of aggregation of the monitoring, and the degree of automation to be used.

The first tradeoff results from heightened concern for bioterrorism and pandemics, while everyday threats involve endemic disease events such as seasonal outbreaks. A system focused on bioterrorist attacks is scenario-based, concerned with unusual diagnoses or patient distributions, and likely to include attack hypothesis testing and tracking tools. A system at the other end of this continuum has broader syndrome groupings and is more concerned with general anomalous levels at manageable alert rates. 

Major aggregation tradeoffs are temporal, spatial, and syndromic. Bioterrorism fears have shortened the time scale of health monitoring from monthly or weekly to near-real-time. The spatial scale of monitoring is a function of the spatial resolution of data recorded and allowable for use as well as the monitoring institution’s purview and its capacity to collect, analyze and investigate localized outbreaks.

Automation tradeoffs involve the use of data processing to collect information, analyze it for anomalies, and make investigation and response decisions. The first of these uses has widespread acceptance, while in the latter two the degree of automation is a subject of ongoing controversy and research. To what degree can human judgment in alerting/response decisions be automated? What are the level and frequency of human inspection and adjustment? Should monitoring frequency change during elevated threat conditions?

All of these decisions affect monitoring tools and practices as well as funding for related research.

Objective

This purpose of this effort is to show how the goals and capabilities of health monitoring institutions can shape the selection, design, and usage of tools for automated disease surveillance systems.

In January 2016, the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA), serving 24 Member States(MS), began executing a regional Tourism and Health program (THP), recognizing that the health of Caribbean economies is closely related to the health of its tourism industry since the Caribbean is most tourism-dependent region in the world; that tourism is vulnerable to health, safety and environmental (HSE) threats; and that travel and tourism impacted on global health security. High and increasing visitors to the Caribbean can increase the health, safety and security risks by the introduction and spread of diseases, by both residents and visitors. This was exemplified by the H1N1 pandemic (2009), Chikungunya (2013), and the recent Zika epidemic. However, even though more people visit the Caribbean than reside, there is no regional visitor/tourism surveillance system. There is also no regional mandate and policy for the reporting of visitor/tourism illnesses. This coupled with inadequate training, lack of standards and collaboration between tourism health stakeholders have contributed to disease spread. The THP is an innovative, multifaceted, integrated, regional program with components of a web based real time Tourism and Health Information Surveillance and Response system (THiS), food safety and environmental sanitation training, standards and multisectoral health and tourism partnerships. It aims to promote the health, safety and security of Caribbean visitors and residents. The THP is novel in that it involves the implementation of a non- traditional, health information and surveillance system (visitor based illnesses), new data users (private sector, hotels, passenger ships, visitors), new partners (tourism sector) and at regional level. Given the novelty and the multisectoral nature of the THP, a critical factor to support its implementation and sustainability was the development of regional mandate and policy to facilitate real time surveillance and response to detect and reduce the spread of illness.

Objective:

The Regional Tourism and Health program (THP) is a novel program, comprising of a tourism surveillance system, training, standards and multisectoral partnerships. The objective was to develop regional mandate and policy to support this new program and its non-traditional surveillance system.

The outbreak of infectious diseases with a propensity to spread across international boundaries is on an upward rise. Such outbreaks can be devastating with significant associated morbidity and mortality. The recent Ebola Virus Disease outbreak in West Africa which spread to Nigeria is an example. Nigeria like several other African countries implements the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) system as its method for achieving the International Health Regulations (IHR). Yet, compliance to the IDSR is questioned. This study seeks to investigate the legal instruments in place and the factors affecting performance of the disease surveillance in the country.

Objective:

Assess the legal framework establishing disease surveillance in Nigeria and identify major factors affecting the performance of the surveillance system.

The Vietnam National HSS was established in 1994. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the epidemic was increasing rapidly, the HSS helped with the intensive close monitoring of the HIV epidemic. In its first 10 years, the HSS was rapidly expanded from 6 to 40 provinces and in some years, it was conducted semi-annually. After two decades, the HIV epidemic situation has changed. In most provinces, HIV prevalence has reported to have declined. Compared to the peak period, the HIV prevalence among key populations (KP) in the past decade decreased from 40-60% to 20% or lower. In many provinces, HIV prevalence was less than 10% among people who inject drugs (PWID) and less than 3% among female sex workers (FSW), and among men who have sex with men (MSM) (Table 1). At the same time, the HIV programme has since been scaled up widely with various interventions and expanded to most of the 63 provinces. In 2014, the government of Vietnam and international stakeholders conducted a joint review of the health sector response to the HIV epidemic and concluded that for better monitoring of the epidemic, a more focused and higher quality surveillance system was needed. In 2015, surveillance stakeholders conducted a detailed review of the HSS to discuss prioritization of the surveillance activities.

Objective:

To describe an exercise to identify priority provinces to be focused in the Vietnam National HIV Sentinel Surveillance (HSS).

As syndromic surveillance reporting became an optional activity under Meaningful Use Stage 3 and incentive funds are slated to end completely in 2021, Washington State sought to protect syndromic reporting from emergency departments. As of December 2016, Washington State emergency departments had received $765,335,529.40 in incentive funding, with facilities receiving an average of three payments of $479,974.04 each.1 Considering the public health importance of syndromic surveillance reporting and the fiscal impact of mandatory reporting, the Washington State Department of Health (WA DOH) sought a new statute to require reporting from all emergency departments within the state.

Objective:

To protect syndromic surveillance data reporting from emergency departments in Washington State beyond the cessation of Meaningful Use incentive funding in 2021.