Kansas Uses a Novel Approach to Assess Injuries to Agricultural Workers

Primary Topic Areas: 
Public Health Problem (100 words): 

Agriculture can be a hazardous industry. Farmers, and oftentimes their family members, are at high risk for injuries, fatalities, and illness. Risks include exposure to pesticides on crop farms and use of tractors, farming equipment, and other machinery.

Each day in the United States, about 100 agricultural workers suffer a lost-work- time injury.1 In 2012, more than 90,000 people2 operated the 61,773 farms3 in Kansas. Another 29,881 were hired crop workers4 employed seasonally. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) wanted to gain a better understanding of how Kansans are affected by agriculture injuries. 

Success Story Narrative (400 words): 

The state of Kansas has 100 health departments, half of which employ fewer than five employees. Rather than ask local health departments to survey each regional emergency department and hospital to characterize the extent of agriculture injuries, KDHE opted to use ESSENCE. The ESSENCE syndromic surveillance (SyS) software application collects prediagnostic data almost in real time. With ESSENCE, once a query has been written, sharing it is easy. A query written in Topeka can be shared widely across health departments. Because many of Kansas’s health departments are small, the need is greater for predesigned standard queries to ease the burden of data collection.

The analyst developing the query quickly discovered, however, that the literal text in the chief complaint field was insufficient for analysis. Having been raised on a farm, he knew from experience that farmers were not verbose in their emergency room complaints. As an alternative to capturing chief complaint, he identified agriculture injuries by using ICD-10 CM codes: W30 (contact with agricultural machinery), Y92.7 (farm as place of occurrence), V84 (occupant of special vehicle mainly used in agriculture), Y93.K9 (activity, other involving animal care). He also looked at data by facility of visit occurrence. Combined, he captured any visit to a Kansas emergency department regardless of patient residence, including visits by seasonal or migrant workers. 

KDHE presented its results for characterizing agriculture injuries at the regional meeting of Western Kansas public health departments. Kansas holds regional public health meetings quarterly in six locations around the state. Meetings are attended by health department administrators, and KDHE analysts frequently use these meetings to report on SyS activities.

At this meeting, the KDHE analyst described how KDHE participates in the National Syndromic Surveillance Program and uses the BioSense Platform’s ESSENCE to conduct syndromic surveillance. “In ESSENCE, all of these charts are 100% interactive,” the analyst said. “I can break [data] out by patient residence, hospital location, race, sex, age, etc.

ESSENCE runs alerting algorithms in the background, so the yellow dots are nearing a significant P-value, and the red dots show a highly significant P-value. All P values are calculated by one-sided tests to determine if counts exceed the number expected based on the previous 60 days. Any of these dots can also be selected to bring up the line-level patient data contributing to the count.” 

Outcomes And Impact (400 words): 

KDHE continues to monitor agriculture-related ED visits. Outreach has been made internally to KDHE’s Injury and Disability Prevention Programs for future direction and research on the subject. Additionally, information was made available to the Kansas Farm Bureau. 

Lessons Learned (400 words): 
  • Seize opportunities to share how you collect data with health administrators and policy makers. The basic message of health promotion should be clear. Explain why the issue is relevant and how people are affected. As data analysts and epidemiologists, always rely on the science to state your case while using language that decision makers will understand. Case studies and personal examples are effective and can stir emotions. Effective communication is essential to secure funding and to justify research.
  • Know the population of interest. Be creative. Look beyond the chief complaint and discharge diagnosis fields.
  • Test all of your ideas in the data environment, no matter how unlikely they are to yield results. Sometimes queries can have surprising results. With syndromic surveillance being such a new field, it takes a lot of trial and error to find new angles and uses for data. 
Submitting Author Name: 
Zach Stein
Submitting Author Title: 
Epidemiologist, Syndromic Surveillance Coordinator
Submitting Author Organization: 
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Submitting Author Email: 
Zach.Stein@ks.gov

February 27, 2018

Contact Us

NSSP Community of Practice

Email: syndromic@cste.org

 

This website is supported by Cooperative Agreement # 6NU38OT000297-02-01 Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation's Health between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC. CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites.

Site created by Fusani Applications