Vaughan-Batten Heather

Time-of-arrival (TOA) surveillance methodology consists of identifying clusters of patients arriving to a hospital emergency department (ED) with similar complaints within a short temporal interval. TOA monitoring of ED visit data is currently conducted by the Florida Department of Health at the county level for multiple subsyndromes [1]. In 2011, North Carolina's NC DETECT system and CDC's Biosense Program collaborated to enhance and adapt this capability for 10 hospital-based Public Health Epidemiologists (PHEs), an ED-based monitoring group established in 2003, for North Carolina's largest hospital systems. At the present time, PHE hospital systems include coverage for approximately 44% of the statewide general/acute care hospital beds and 32% of all emergency department visits statewide. We present findings from TOA monitoring in one hospital system.

Objective

To describe collaborations between North Carolina Division of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) implementing time-of-arrival (TOA) surveillance to monitor for exposure-related visits to emergency departments (ED) in small groups of North Carolina hospitals.

The North Carolina Division of Public Health (NC DPH) has been collecting emergency department data in collaboration with the Carolina Center for Health Informatics in the UNC Department of Emergency Medicine since 1999. As of August 2011, there are 113 of 115 emergency departments sending data electronically at least once daily to NC DETECT. Data elements include disposition, initial vital signs, up to 11 ICD-9-CM final diagnosis codes, up to five external cause of injury codes (E-codes),as well as the arrival date and time, patient sex and age, patient zip and county, and chief complaint. As of January 2008, NC DETECT emergency department data covered 99% of the NC population and captures approximately 4.5 million ED visits each year. As a result, requests for data from researchers continue to increase. Use of the data for public health purposes is covered by the mandate requiring hospitals to submit their emergency department data to NC DPH.

Objective

To describe the process by which researchers request access to data sets of emergency department data from NC DETECT,the history of this process,and the resulting best practices and lessons learned.

NC DETECT provides near-real-time statewide surveillance capacity to local, regional and state level users across NC with twice daily data feeds from 117 (99%) emergency departments (EDs), hourly updates from the statewide poison center, and daily feeds from statewide EMS runs and select urgent care centers. The NC DETECT Web Application provides access to aggregate and line listing analyses customized to users' respective jurisdictions. The most active users are state-level epidemiologists (DPH) and hospital-based public health epidemiologists (PHEs). The use of NC DETECT is included in PHE job descriptions and NC DETECT functionality has been developed specifically to meet the surveillance needs of this group, including data entry of aggregated lab results for flu and respiratory panels. Interviews of local health department (LHD) users completed as part of an evaluation project have suggested that functionality specifically tailored to LHDs may increase their use of the NC DETECT Web application [1]. As of June 2011, there were 139 LHD users with active accounts to use the Web application (out of 384 total users with active accounts).

Objective

To describe the development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of new dashboard interfaces in NC DETECT, designed primarily for infrequent users of NC DETECT at local health departments.

Animal bites may have potentially devastating consequences, including physical and emotional trauma, infection, rabies exposure, hospitalization, and, rarely, death. NC law requires animal bites be reported to local health directors. However, methods for recording and storing bite data vary among municipalities. NC does not have a statewide system for reporting and surveillance of animal bites. Additionally, many animal bites are likely not reported to the appropriate agencies. NC DETECT provides near-real-time statewide surveillance capacity to local, regional, and state level users with twice daily data feeds from NC EDs. Between 2008 and 2010, 110 to 113 EDs were submitting visit data to NC DETECT. Several animal bite-related on-line reports are available and provide aggregate and visit-level analyses customized to users' respective jurisdictions. The NC DETECT ED visit database currently provides the most comprehensive and cost-effective source of animal bite data in NC.

Objective

We describe the use of emergency department (ED) visit data collected through the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT) for surveillance of animal bites in North Carolina (NC). Animal bite surveillance using ED visit data provides useful and timely information for public health practitioners involved in bite surveillance and prevention in NC.