Skip to main content

Swenson David

Description

While UC does not have a standard definition, it can generally be described as the delivery of ambulatory medical care outside of a hospital emergency department (ED) on a walk-in basis, without a scheduled appointment, available at extended hours, and providing an array of services comparable to typical primary care offices. UC facilities represent a growing sector of the United States healthcare industry, doubling in size between 2008 and 2011. The Urgent Care Association of America (UCAOA) estimates that UC facilities had 160 million patient encounters in 2013. This compares to 130.4 million patient encounters in EDs in 2013, as reported by the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Public Health (PH) is actively working to broaden syndromic surveillance to include urgent care data as more individuals use these services. PH needs justification when reaching out to healthcare partners to get buy-in for collecting and reporting UC data.

Objective:

Provide justification for the collection and reporting of urgent care (UC) data for public health syndromic surveillance.

Submitted by elamb on
Description

The US Department of Health and Human Services has mandated that after October 1, 2015, all HIPAA covered entities must transition from using International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD- 9) codes to using version 10 (ICD-10) codes (www.cms.gov). This will impact public health surveillance entities that receive, analyze, and report ICD-9 encoded data. Public health agencies will need to modify existing database structures, extraction rules, and messaging guides, as well as syndrome definitions and underlying analytics, statistical methodologies, and business rules. Implementation challenges include resources, funding, workforce capabilities, and time constraints for code translation and syndrome reclassification.

Objective

To describe the process undertaken to translate syndromic surveillance syndromes and sub-syndromes from ICD-9 diagnostic codes to ICD-10 codes and how these translations can be used to improve syndromic surveillance practice.

Submitted by rmathes on
Description

On October 1, 2015, the number of ICD codes will expand from 14,000 in version 9 to 68,000 in version 10. The new code set will increase the specificity of reporting, allowing more information to be conveyed in a single code. It is anticipated that the conversion will have a significant impact on public health surveillance by enhancing the capture of reportable diseases, injuries, and conditions of public health importance that have traditionally been the target of syndromic surveillance monitoring. For public health departments, the upcoming conversion poses a number of challenges, including: 1) Constraints in allocating resources to modify existing systems to accommodate the new code set, 2) Lack of ICD-10 expertise and training to identify which codes are most appropriate for surveillance, 3) Mapping syndrome definitions across code sets, 4) Limited understanding of the precise ICD-10 CM codes that will be used in the US Healthcare system, and 5) Adjusting for changes in trends over time that are due to transitions in usage of codes by providers and billing systems. To accommodate the ICD-9 to ICD-10 transition, the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) partnered with the International Society of Disease Surveillance (ISDS) CoP to form a workgroup to develop the Master Mapping Reference Table (MMRT). This tool maps over 130 syndromes across the two coding systems to assist agencies in modifying existing database structures, extraction rules, and messaging guides, as well as revising established syndromic surveillance definitions and underlying analytic and business rules.

Objective

This roundtable will provide a forum for the syndromic surveillance Community of Practice (CoP) to discuss the public health impacts from the ICD-10-CM conversion, and to support jurisdictional public health practices with this transition. It will be an opportunity to discuss key impacts on disease surveillance and implementation challenges; and identify solutions, best practices, and needs for technical assistance.

Submitted by teresa.hamby@d… on
Description

As of October 1, 2015, all HIPAA covered entities transition from the use of International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9-CM) to version 10 (ICD-10-CM/PCS). Many Public Health surveillance entities receive, interpret, analyze, and report ICD-9 encoded data, which will all be significantly impacted by the transition. Public health agencies will need to modify existing database structures, extraction rules, and messaging guides, as well as revise established syndromic surveillance definitions and underlying analytic and business rules to accommodate this transition. Implementation challenges include resource, funding, and time constraints for code translation and syndrome classification, and developing statistical methodologies to accommodate changes to coding practices.

To address these challenges, the International Society for Disease Surveillance (ISDS), in consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE), has conducted a project to develop consensus-driven syndrome definitions based on ICD- 10-CM codes. The goal was to have the newly created ICD-9-CM to-ICD-10-CM mappings and corresponding syndromic definitions fully reviewed and vetted by the syndromic surveillance community, which relies on these codes for routine surveillance, as well as for research purposes. The mappings may be leveraged by other federal, state, and local public health entities to better prepare and improve the surveillance, analytics, and reporting activities impacted by the ICD-10-CM transition.

Objective

To describe the process undertaken to translate syndromic surveillance syndromes and sub-syndromes consisting of ICD-9 CM diagnostic codes to syndromes and sub-syndromes consisting of ICD-10-CM codes, and how these translations can be used to improve syndromic surveillance practice.

Submitted by teresa.hamby@d… on

The transition of all HIPAA covered entities from the use of ICD­9­CM to ICD­10­CM/PCS codes on October 1, 2015 will create a paradigm change in the use of electronic health record (EHR) data. Many public health surveillance entities that receive, interpret, analyze, and report ICD­9 encoded data will be significantly impacted by the transition. Is your jurisdiction ready? Do you have a plan in place?



ISDS is kicking off the year with a webinar to review highlights from the 2016 Annual Conference in Atlanta, GA. If you attended the conference, we invite you to come share and learn more about initiatives sprung from the conference, and to discuss how best to continue moving them ahead. If you were unable to attend the conference, please join us to hear from our Conference Chairs about session highlights and key takeaways. We will also be discussing post-conference evaluation findings and informally collecting feedback for next year's conference.

More and more patients frequent Urgent Care facilites. In this webinar, we will discuss how NSSP jurisdictions collect it, how is it formatted, and what have they learned; what's the best way to capture and share this information; and why should we collect and report this data.

Presenters

David Swenson, AHEDD Project Manager, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health Services, Communicable Disease Surveillance Section