Skip to main content

Revere Debra

Infectious disease outbreaks, such as the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, highlight the need for surveillance systems to quickly detect outbreaks and provide data to prevent future pandemics. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Joint External Evaluation (JEE) tool to conduct country-level assessments of surveillance capacity. However, considering that outbreaks begin and are first detected at the local level, national-level evaluations may fail to identify capacity improvements for outbreak detection. The gaps in local surveillance system processes illuminate a need for investment in on-the-ground surveillance improvements that may be lower cost than traditional surveillance improvement initiatives, such as enhanced training or strengthening data transfer mechanisms before building new laboratory facilities. To explore this premise, we developed a methodology for assessing surveillance systems with special attention to the local level and applied this methodology to the malaria outbreak surveillance system in Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe.

Objective: To conduct a field-based assessment of the malaria outbreak surveillance system in Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe.

Submitted by elamb on

The Distribute project began in 2006 as a distributed, syndromic surveillance demonstration project that networked state and local health departments to share aggregate emergency department-based influenza-like illness (ILI) syndrome data. Preliminary work found that local systems often applied syndrome definitions specific to their regions; these definitions were sometimes trusted and understood better than standardized ones because they allowed for regional variations in idiom and coding and were tailored by departments for their own surveillance needs. Originally, sites were asked to send whatever syndrome definition they had found most useful for monitoring ILI. Places using multiple definitions were asked to send their broader, higher count syndrome. In 2008, sites were asked to send both a broad syndrome, and a narrow syndrome specific to ILI.

 

Objective

To describe the initial phase of the ISDS Distribute project ILI syndrome standardization pilot.

Referenced File
Submitted by hparton on

Cost-effective, flexible and innovative tools that integrate disparate data sets and allow sharing of information between geographically dispersed collaborators are needed to improve public health surveillance practice. Gossamer Health (Good Open Standards System for Aggregating, Monitoring and Electronic Reporting of Health), http://gossamerhealth.org, is an open source system, suitable for server or "cloud" deployment, that is designed for the collection, analysis, interpretation and visualization of syndromic surveillance data and other indicators to monitor population health. The Gossamer Health system combines applied public health informatics research conducted at the University of Washington Center for Public Health Informatics and Washington State Department of Health, in collaboration with other state and local health jurisdictions, the International Society for Disease Surveillance and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Objective

The goal of this work is to make available to the public health community an open source system that makes available in a standards-based, modular fashion the basic tools required to conduct automated indicator-based population health surveillance. These tools may be deployed in a flexible fashion on health department servers, in the Amazon EC2 cloud, or in any combination, and are coupled through well-defined standards-based interfaces.

Referenced File
Submitted by elamb on

Distribute is a national emergency department syndromic surveillance project developed by the International Society for Disease Surveillance for influenza-like-illness (ILI) that integrates data from existing state and local public health department surveillance systems. The Distribute project provides graphic comparisons of both ILI-related clinical visits across jurisdictions and a national picture of ILI. Unlike other surveillance systems, Distribute is designed to work solely with summarized (aggregated) data which cannot be traced back to the un-aggregated 'raw' data. This and the distributed, voluntary nature of the project creates some unique data quality issues, with considerable site to site variability. Together with the ISDS, the University of Washington has developed processes and tools to address these challenges, mirroring work done by others in the Distribute community.

Objective

To present exploratory tools and methods developed as part of the data quality monitoring of Distribute data, and discuss these tools and their applications with other participants.

Referenced File
Submitted by elamb on

Distribute is a national emergency department syndromic surveillance project developed by the International Society for Disease Surveillance (ISDS) for influenza-like-illness (ILI) that integrates data from existing state and local public health department surveillance systems. The Distribute is a national emergency department syndromic surveillance project developed by the International Society for Disease Surveillance (ISDS) for influenza-like-illness (ILI) that integrates data from existing state and local public health department surveillance systems. The Distribute project provides graphic comparisons of both ILI-related clinical visits across jurisdictions and a national picture of ILI. Unlike other surveillance systems, Distribute is designed to work solely with summarized (aggregated) data which cannot be traced back to the un-aggregated 'raw' data. This and the distributed, voluntary nature of the project create some unique data quality issues, with considerable site to site variability. Together with the ISDS, the University of Washington has developed processes and tools to address these challenges, mirroring work done by others in the Distribute community.

Objective

The goal of this session will be to briefly present two methods for comparing aggregate data quality and invite continued discussion on data quality from other surveillance practitioners, and to present the range of data quality results across participating Distribute sites.

Referenced File
Submitted by elamb on

The importance transmitting clinical information to public health for disease surveillance is well-documented. Conventional reporting processes require health care providers to complete paper-based notifiable condition reports which are transmitted by fax and mail to public health agencies. These processes result in incomplete reports, inconsistencies in reporting frequencies among different diseases and reporting delays as well as time-consuming follow-up by public health to get needed information. One strategy to address these issues is to electronically pre-populate report forms with available clinical, lab and patient data to streamline reporting workflows, increase data completeness and, ultimately, provide access to more timely and accurate surveillance data for public health organizations. Prior to implementing an intervention that includes using pre-populated forms, we conducted interviews in clinical and public health settings to identify the barriers and facilitators to adopting and utilizing the forms and their potential impact on workflow and perceived burden. These interviews are a component of a larger mixed methods evaluation that will triangulate pre- and post-intervention quantitative data quality measures with qualitative results.

Objective

Introduction of new health information technologies can produce unanticipated consequences on existing user behaviors, workflow, etc. Prior to implementing a public health reporting intervention, we conducted a series of interviews regarding workflow and perceptions of task burden with respect to notifiable condition reporting.

Submitted by knowledge_repo… on

The effectiveness of emergency preparedness and response systems depends, in part, on the effectiveness of communication between agencies and individuals involved in emergency response, including health care providers who play a significant role in planning, event detection, response and communication with the public. Although much attention has been paid to the importance of communicating clinical data from health care providers to public health agencies for purposes of early event detection and situational awareness (e.g., BioSense) and to the need for alerting health care providers of public health events (e.g., Health Alert Networks), no studies to date have systematically identified the most effective methods of communication between public health agencies and community health care providers for purposes of public health emergency preparedness and response. The REACH (Rapid Emergency Alert Communication in Health) study is a 4-year randomized controlled trial to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of mobile (SMS) and traditional (email, FAX) communication strategies for sending public health messages to health care providers—physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants and veterinarians.

Objective:

To systematically compare mobile (SMS) and traditional (email, FAX) communication strategies to identify which modality is most effective for communication of health alerts and advisories between public health agencies and health care providers in order to improve emergency preparedness and response.

 

Submitted by Magou on
Subscribe to Revere Debra