Skip to main content

Bansal Shweta

Description

Traditional infectious disease epidemiology is built on the foundation of high quality and high accuracy data on disease and behavior. Digital infectious disease epidemiology, on the other hand, uses existing digital traces, re-purposing them to identify patterns in health-related processes. Medical claims are an emerging digital data source in surveillance; they capture patient-level data across an entire population of healthcare seekers, and have the benefits of medical accuracy through physician diagnoses, and fine spatial and temporal resolution in near real-time. Our work harnesses the large volume and high specificity of diagnosis codes in medical claims to improve our understanding of the mechanisms driving spatial variation in reported influenza activity each year. The mechanisms hypothesized to drive these patterns are as varied as: environmental factors affecting transmission or virus survival, travel flows between different populations, population age structure, and socioeconomic factors linked to healthcare access and quality of life. Beyond process mechanisms, the nature of surveillance data collection may affect our interpretation of spatial epidemiological patterns, particularly since influenza is a non-reportable disease with non-specific symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to severe. Considering the ways in which medical claims are generated, biases may arise from healthcare-seeking behavior, insurance coverage, and medical claims database coverage in study populations.

Objective

To assess the use of medical claims records for surveillance and epidemiological inference through a case study that examines how ecological and social determinants and measurement error contribute to spatial heterogeneity in reports of influenza-like illness across the United States.

Submitted by Magou on
Description

In the United States, surveillance of vaccine uptake for childhood infections is limited in scope and spatial resolution. The National Immunization Survey (NIS) - the gold standard tool for monitoring vaccine uptake among children aged 19-35 months - is typically constrained to producing coarse state-level estimates. In recent years, vaccine hesitancy (i.e., a desire to delay or refuse vaccination, despite availability of vaccination services) has resurged in the United States, challenging the maintenance of herd immunity. In December 2014, foreign importation of the measles virus to Disney theme parks in Orange County, California resulted in an outbreak of 111 measles cases, 45% of which were among unvaccinated individuals. Digital health data offer new opportunities to study the social determinants of vaccine hesitancy in the United States and identify finer spatial resolution clusters of under-immunization using data with greater clinical accuracy and rationale for hesitancy.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of large-scale medical claims data for local surveillance of under-immunization for childhood infections in the United States, to develop a statistical framework for integrating disparate data sources on surveillance of vaccination behavior, and to identify the determinants of vaccine hesitancy behavior. 

Submitted by Magou on